Our Methodology

Understanding how we create transparent, educational comparisons

Our Evaluation Process

At Genuine Comparisons, we follow a systematic approach to ensure our comparisons are fair, accurate, and helpful. Our methodology is designed to provide educational value without bias or commercial influence.

1. Research Phase

We begin by conducting comprehensive research using only publicly available information including:

  • Official product documentation and websites
  • User manuals and help resources
  • Published pricing information
  • Feature lists and specifications
  • Public user reviews and feedback

2. Evaluation Criteria

We evaluate software and services based on objective criteria:

  • Functionality: Core features and capabilities
  • Usability: Ease of use and learning curve
  • Value: Pricing relative to features offered
  • Support: Available help resources and customer service
  • Integration: Compatibility with other tools
  • Reliability: Uptime and performance considerations

3. Neutral Analysis

Our analysis maintains strict neutrality by:

  • Avoiding rankings based on commercial relationships
  • Presenting both advantages and limitations fairly
  • Focusing on use cases rather than "best" products
  • Using factual information rather than opinions
  • Clearly stating when information is limited or unavailable

4. Educational Focus

Every comparison is designed to educate rather than persuade:

  • Explaining features in clear, understandable terms
  • Providing context for different use cases
  • Helping users identify their own needs
  • Encouraging further research and trial periods
  • Avoiding emotional language or pressure tactics

5. Transparency Standards

We maintain complete transparency by:

  • Clearly stating our information sources
  • Acknowledging limitations in our knowledge
  • Providing direct links to official sources
  • Regular updates when significant changes occur
  • Clear disclaimers about the educational nature of content

6. Quality Assurance

Before publication, each comparison undergoes:

  • Fact-checking against official sources
  • Review for bias or promotional language
  • Verification of all external links
  • Proofreading for clarity and accuracy
  • Compliance with our editorial guidelines

Important Note

Our comparisons are based solely on publicly available information and are intended for educational purposes only. We do not have partnerships with the companies we compare, nor do we receive compensation for our reviews. Users should always conduct their own research, try free trials when available, and make decisions based on their specific needs and circumstances.